Cherokee 3.2L Limited vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4341 mm
1860 mm
1804 mm
1681 mm
1693 mm
2718 mm
2676 mm
841 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
60 L
50 L
9.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.2 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
115 BHP
324 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Limited
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Limited if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Limited has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Limited has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Limited uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.