Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs LX Comfort 1.5T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185 km/h

180 km/h

/

4

/

1498 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4624 mm

4520 mm

1860 mm

1848 mm

1681 mm

1690 mm

2718 mm

2670 mm

841 L

400 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

9.9 Km/L

15 Km/L

60 L

51 L

9.9 Km/L

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.2 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

184 BHP - 272 BHP

144 HP - 197 BHP

Automatic

7DCT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

271 BHP

156 BHP

324 Nm

230 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • LX Comfort 1.5T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLX Comfort 1.5T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose LX Comfort 1.5T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while LX Comfort 1.5T has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, LX Comfort 1.5T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while LX Comfort 1.5T has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while LX Comfort 1.5T uses Front Wheel Drive.