CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1790 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4390 mm
4680 mm
1795 mm
1840 mm
1565 mm
1725 mm
2640 mm
2706 mm
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
15.6 Km/L
43 L
60 L
16 Km/L
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
2.5 L
121 BHP
132 BHP - 188 BHP
CVT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.8 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
None
4
4
96 BHP
188 BHP
142 Nm
244 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) if you care more about fuel economy; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.25, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.