Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L vs Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
234
235
8
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
5.040
4885
1.900
1840
1.490
1445
3.050
2824
462
427
Fuel Economy
8.1
14.3
72
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
5.7 L
3.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
363 BHP
298 BHP
534
356
Motor
N/A
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
176 BHP - 298 BHP
/
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L if you care more about power; choose Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L has a fuel consumption of 12.35, while Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L has a wheelbase of 3.050, while Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 has a wheelbase of 2824. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Chrysler 300C 2014 Chrysler 300C 2014 5.7L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Toyota Camry 2024 3.5L Grande (298 HP) V6 uses Front Wheel Drive.