Ciciv SPORT vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
190
/
4
Dimensions
5
5
4689
4650
1801
1905
1415
1630
,735
2775
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
47
51
/
15.8
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
6
✓
/
/
13.2
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.5
123 BHP - 180 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic & CVT
7AT & AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
202 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
305
5000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mage E1 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ciciv SPORT uses No data, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.