City 1.5L LX Sport 2025 vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison

Car Information

/

7.3

/

18.3 kw/h

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

185

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

4

4553 mm

4765

1748 mm

1837

1467 mm

1495

2600 mm

2720

510 L

500

/

Flush Door

/

1500

/

17

Fuel Economy

13.3 Km/L

26

40 L

48

13.3 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

8.8

/

LCD

/

Front Row Seats

/

Sensatec Leather

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag

/

/

/

Front Row

Infotainment

/

10.1-inch rotating screen

/

/

/

6

Battery/Charging

/

6.6

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

MacPherson

/

Torsion Beam

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5 L

118 BHP - 119

177 BHP - 197 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

119 BHP

197 BHP

145 Nm

325

/

Plug in Hybrid

Motor

/

145

/

325

/

1

/

Lithium iron phosphate battery

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Sport, Ordinary, Economical

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

    • ABS
  • Qin Plus FWD

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Low fuel consumption and economical
  • High manufacturing quality and reliability

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited at high speeds
  • Lack of some modern technical features
  • Sound insulation from the outside may be poor

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCity 1.5L LX Sport 2025

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose City 1.5L LX Sport 2025 if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Elantra 2022 2.0L Comfort

Honda | City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2021 1.5L Turbo LS

Honda | City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

VS

Bestune | B70 COM

Honda | City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

VS

Hyundai | Elantra 1.6L Comfort

Honda | City 1.5L LX Sport 2025

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Jetta 2018 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, City 1.5L LX Sport 2025 has a fuel consumption of 7.52, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, City 1.5L LX Sport 2025 has a wheelbase of 2600 mm, while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Qin Plus FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. City 1.5L LX Sport 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.