Cityray GC vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
206 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4510
4385 mm
1865
2019 mm
1650
1608 mm
2701
2603 mm
/
460 L
Fuel Economy
/
15.4 Km/L
/
58 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
Drive Door
/
✓
/
Interior
10.2
/
Leather
/
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
7 DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
1.4 L - 2.0 L
174
150 BHP - 220 BHP
7 DCT
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
174
150 BHP
290
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cityray GC
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCityray GC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cityray GC if you care more about price; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cityray GC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cityray GC has a wheelbase of 2701, while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cityray GC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cityray GC uses No data, while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.