Cityray GF vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
4510
4680 mm
1865
1840 mm
1650
1725 mm
2701
2706 mm
/
5 Doors
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
/
15.6 Km/L
/
60 L
/
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Front Side
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
7 DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
2.5 L
174
132 BHP - 188 BHP
7 DCT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
174
188 BHP
290
244 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cityray GF
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCityray GF
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cityray GF if you care more about price; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cityray GF has a fuel consumption of No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cityray GF has a wheelbase of 2701, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cityray GF uses No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.