CarteaCompare CarsCLA 250 4MATIC Coupé vs Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody

CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé vs Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody Comparison

Car Information

6.3

/

Engine / Motor

250

280 km/h

/

8

/

6400 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4,640

5105 mm

1,777

1989 mm

1,432

1468 mm

2,699

3028 mm

/

4 Doors

/

467 L

/

132 m

Fuel Economy

11.6

6 Km/L

51

70 L

/

6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

8.4

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

6

Transmission

7-speed automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

163 - 224 BHP

292 BHP - 797 BHP

7-speed automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Engine

2.0L

6.4 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

224HP

485 BHP

165

/

350

644 Nm

/

V

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Amazing power and acceleration
  • Unique American muscular design
  • Pleasant driving experience and excellent control

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The quality of interior materials is average
  • Suspension comfort is not ideal

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé if you care more about price; choose Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

VS

Dodge | Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XE 2020 2.0T R-Dynamic (250 PS)

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2018 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS) Sportbrake

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

VS

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé has a fuel consumption of 8.62, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé has a wheelbase of 2,699, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody has a wheelbase of 3028 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody uses Rear Wheel Drive.