CLS 450 4MATIC vs Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
270 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
✓
/
4998
5262 mm
1890
1948 mm
1435
1481 mm
2939
3171 mm
520
530 L
Fuel Economy
8.5
11 Km/L
80
80 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0
3.0 L - 3.8 L
367 BHP
350 BHP - 580 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
367 BHP
350 BHP
500
500 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CLS 450 4MATIC
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQuattroporte 3.0T V6 GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about power; choose Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2939, while Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT has a wheelbase of 3171 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CLS 450 4MATIC uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.