Comfortline RWD vs Telluride 3.8L V6 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
6
/
3778 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2220
/
4770
500 mm
1930
1990 mm
1625
1750 mm
2880
2900 mm
/
5 Doors
/
594 L
/
203 m
Fuel Economy
/
8 Km/L
56
71 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
Nappa Leather Seat
Leather
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
11
12
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Battery/Charging
30 Min
/
3.3 Hours
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
0.0 L -
3.8 L - 3.8 L
220 BHP - 530 BHP
291 - 291
AT
8 Speed AT & Automatic
Electric & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
3.8 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
262
291 BHP
354
355 Nm
/
V
/
4
Motor
Ternary Lithium Battery (NCM) / Capacity 40 kWh
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Comfortline RWD
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Telluride 3.8L V6
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Comfortline RWD if you care more about price; choose Telluride 3.8L V6 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Comfortline RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Telluride 3.8L V6 has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Comfortline RWD has a wheelbase of 2880, while Telluride 3.8L V6 has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Telluride 3.8L V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Comfortline RWD uses No data, while Telluride 3.8L V6 uses All Wheel Drive.