Commander Limited Plus vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0
1.6 L - 2.0 L
272
105 BHP - 135 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
272
115 BHP
400
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Commander Limited Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCommander Limited Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Commander Limited Plus if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Commander Limited Plus has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Commander Limited Plus has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Limited Plus uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.