Commander Limited Plus vs Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

/

5049 mm

/

2004 mm

/

1775 mm

/

3025 mm

/

515 L

Fuel Economy

/

12.8 Km/L

/

67 L

/

12.8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0

2.3 L - 3.5 L

272

290 BHP - 400 BHP

TBD

10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

272

300 BHP

400

420 Nm

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Commander Limited Plus

    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCommander Limited Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Commander Limited Plus if you care more about price; choose Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Commander Limited Plus

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Jeep | Commander Limited Plus

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Jeep | Commander Limited Plus

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Jeep | Commander Limited Plus

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Jeep | Commander Limited Plus

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Commander Limited Plus has a fuel consumption of No data, while Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Commander Limited Plus has a wheelbase of No data, while Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD has a wheelbase of 3025 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Limited Plus uses No data, while Explorer 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD uses All Wheel Drive.