Commander Overland vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5
/
5
/
4400 mm
/
1830 mm
/
1590 mm
/
2630 mm
Fuel Economy
/
7.1
/
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
10.25
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0
1.5 L - 1.5 L
272
156 BHP - 197 BHP
TBD
7 Speed DCT & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
272
194 BHP
400
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Commander Overland
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
C5 TECH 1.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC5 TECH 1.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Commander Overland if you care more about power; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Commander Overland has a fuel consumption of No data, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Commander Overland has a wheelbase of No data, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Overland uses No data, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.