Commander Overland vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

161 km/h

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

/

16

/

4341 mm

/

1804 mm

/

1693 mm

/

2676 mm

/

414 L

Fuel Economy

/

17.2 Km/L

/

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0

1.6 L - 2.0 L

272

105 BHP - 135 BHP

TBD

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

272

115 BHP

400

156 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Commander Overland

    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCommander Overland

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Commander Overland if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Commander Overland

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Jeep | Commander Overland

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Jeep | Commander Overland

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Jeep | Commander Overland

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Jeep | Commander Overland

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Commander Overland has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Commander Overland has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Overland uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.