Coolray GC vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

GCC

/

/

210

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

18

/

4

/

4380

4549

1800

1860

1615

1689

2600

2734

Fuel Economy

17.8

14.9

45

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

10.25" TFT Screen

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather Wrapped

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Transmission

7

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Electric

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1500 L

2.0 L

171 BHP - 177 BHP

216 BHP

7DCT & Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

172 BHP

216 BHP

290

325

91

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Coolray GC

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Coolray GC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Geely | Coolray GC

VS

Geely | Coolray GC

Geely | Coolray GC

VS

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

Geely | Coolray GC

VS

BAIC | BJ40 C 2.0T 8AT Luxury

Geely | Coolray GC

VS

Kia | Kia Sonet 2024 1.5L LX

Geely | Coolray GC

VS

Lynk & Co | 06 Core Plus

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Coolray GC has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Coolray GC is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Coolray GC has a wheelbase of 2600, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Coolray GC uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.