Coolray GF+ vs BJ40 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1981 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18"
/
4380
4645 mm
1810
1925 mm
1615
1871 mm
2600
2745 mm
/
5 Doors
/
532 L
/
220 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
8"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
14.6"
/
PVC Sports Style Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
6
6
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
171 BHP - 177 BHP
218 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172
218 BHP
290
320 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Coolray GF+
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
BJ40 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCoolray GF+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Coolray GF+ if you care more about price; choose BJ40 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Coolray GF+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while BJ40 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Coolray GF+ has a wheelbase of 2600, while BJ40 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BJ40 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Coolray GF+ uses No data, while BJ40 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.