Coolray GL 1.5T vs BYD e2 Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
5
/
17"
/
4380
/
1810
/
1615
/
2600
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8"
/
✓
/
8.8"
/
PVC Sports Style Leather
/
Safety
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
TBD
171 BHP - 177 BHP
TBD
7DCT & Automatic & Manual
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
/
Gasoline
/
172
/
290
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Coolray GL 1.5T
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
BYD e2
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBYD e2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Coolray GL 1.5T if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD e2 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Coolray GL 1.5T has a fuel consumption of No data, while BYD e2 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Coolray GL 1.5T has a wheelbase of 2600, while BYD e2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Coolray GL 1.5T uses No data, while BYD e2 uses No data.