Coolray 2025 GL vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1477 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4380 mm
4760 mm
1810 mm
1930 mm
1615 mm
1927 mm
2600 mm
2750 mm
330 L
400 L
180 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
10 Km/L
45 L
75 L
16 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Bucket
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
6
9
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
171 BHP - 177 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
172 BHP
224 BHP
290 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Coolray 2025 GL
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Coolray 2025 GL if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Coolray 2025 GL has a fuel consumption of 6.25, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Coolray 2025 GL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Coolray 2025 GL has a wheelbase of 2600 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Coolray 2025 GL uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.