CR-V DX vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison

Car Information

Gasoline

/

Honda

/

/

/

140.7

/

243

/

4706x1866x1691

/

6.45

/

1.5

/

/

7.3S

/

420

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

Engine / Motor

4

/

1498cc

/

/

160 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5

1668

/

17 英寸

215/55R18

/

/

4706

4455 mm

1866

2050 mm

1681

1615 mm

2700

2720 mm

150

440 L

198

205 mm

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

57

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

/

7

5

/

/

LCD

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

8

8

/

Battery/Charging

/

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

Transmission

CVT

/

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/65R17

/

235/65R17

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.4 L

/

184 BHP - 190

201 BHP

Automatic & CVT

AT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater - 7

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

420 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5

/

Gasoline

Electric

Turbocharge

/

1.5L VTEC Turbo

/

4

/

10.3:1

/

DOHC DUAL VTC + Exhaust-VTEC

/

190

201 BHP

140.7

/

6000

/

243

310 Nm

1700-5000

/

直喷

/

Euro 5

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

9

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CR-V DX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Rear Crumple Zone
    • Front Crumple Zone
    • Front and Rear Crumple Zone
    • Rollover stability control
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Atto 3 Premium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • High reliability and durable performance
  • A wide range of security technologies
  • Excellent fuel efficiency

Negative

  • The price is higher than some competitors
  • Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
  • Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCR-V DX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CR-V DX if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | CR-V DX

VS

Volkswagen | Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L

Honda | CR-V DX

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Honda | CR-V DX

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 05 2023 2.0T Hyper Halo (AWD)

Honda | CR-V DX

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2025 High

Honda | CR-V DX

VS

MG | MG HS 2024 1.5T Luxury (PHEV)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CR-V DX has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CR-V DX has a wheelbase of 2700, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Premium, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CR-V DX uses Front Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.