Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4211 mm
4771 mm
1765 mm
1870 mm
1605 mm
1828 mm
2604 mm
2790 mm
410 L
/
Fuel Economy
20.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
45 L
/
20.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.2 L
2.0 L
110 BHP
215 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
215 BHP
205 Nm
280 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy has a fuel consumption of 4.81, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy has a wheelbase of 2604 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.