Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4211 mm
4440 mm
1765 mm
1833 mm
1605 mm
1560 mm
2604 mm
2700 mm
410 L
330 L
Fuel Economy
20.8 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
45 L
60 L
20.8 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.2 L
1.8 L
110 BHP
130 BHP - 133 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
130 BHP
205 Nm
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy has a fuel consumption of 4.81, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy has a wheelbase of 2604 mm, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS Sport 1.8L Classic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Crossland X 1.2T Enjoy uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.