CS75 PLUS SPORT vs X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7

4700

4838

1865

1914

1710

1775

2710

2830

/

18

/

5 Doors

/

510 L

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

/

12 Km/L

58

57 L

/

12 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12

/

Front Row Seats

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

6

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

12.3

/

/

8

8

SONY

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

8

/

8-Speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/55 R19

/

225/55 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

229 BHP - 233 BHP

197 - 254

8-Speed Automatic

7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

7 - 7

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

2.0T GDI

/

233 BHP

254

390

390 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about power; choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

GMC | GMC Terrain 2022 1.5T AT4

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2018 EX Plus (AWD)

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

GMC | Terrain 2025 Elevation

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Innova 2024 2.0L GL (8 Seater)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710, while X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive, while X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.