CS75 PLUS SPORT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4700
4760 mm
1865
1930 mm
1710
1927 mm
2710
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
58
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
8
9
SONY
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8
/
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/55 R19
/
225/55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L
229 BHP - 233 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0T GDI
/
233 BHP
224 BHP
390
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Economy
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS75 PLUS SPORT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.