CS75 PLUS SPORT vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4700
4949 mm
1865
1930 mm
1710
1790 mm
2710
2810 mm
Fuel Economy
/
10.5 Km/L
58
74 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
SONY
/
Transmission
8
/
8-Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/55 R19
/
225/55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
229 BHP - 233 BHP
233 - 233
8-Speed Automatic
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 7
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0T GDI
/
233 BHP
233 BHP
390
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Economy
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS75 PLUS SPORT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about overall equipment; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.