CarteaCompare CarsCS75 PLUS SPORT vs X95 1.6T

CS75 PLUS SPORT vs X95 1.6T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

185 km/h

/

4

/

1598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4700

4858 mm

1865

1925 mm

1710

1780 mm

2710

2855 mm

/

5 Doors

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

/

12.3 Km/L

58

57 L

/

12.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12

/

Front Row Seats

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

12.3

/

/

8

12

SONY

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

8

/

8-Speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/55 R19

/

225/55 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.6 L

229 BHP - 233 BHP

197 BHP

8-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

7 Seater

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

2.0T GDI

/

233 BHP

197 BHP

390

290 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • X95 1.6T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCS75 PLUS SPORT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about price; choose X95 1.6T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while X95 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710, while X95 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X95 1.6T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive, while X95 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.