CS95 ROYAL vs 03T Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7
/
4949
/
1930
/
1790
/
2810
/
Fuel Economy
10.5
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10+Amplifier
/
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
245 / 55 R19
/
245 / 55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
TBD
233 BHP
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 T
/
Gasoline
/
233
/
390
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS95 ROYAL
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
03T
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick03T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about overall equipment; choose 03T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while 03T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while 03T has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 03T uses No data.