CS95 ROYAL vs BJ30e Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4949
/
1930
/
1790
/
2810
/
Fuel Economy
10.5
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10+Amplifier
/
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
245 / 55 R19
/
245 / 55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
233 - 233
154 BHP - 185
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
7DCT & DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
233
154 BHP
390
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS95 ROYAL
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
BJ30e
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBJ30e
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about power; choose BJ30e if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while BJ30e has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while BJ30e has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while BJ30e uses No data.