CS95 ROYAL vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5
4949
4,825
1930
1,980
1790
1,620
2810
2,940
Fuel Economy
10.5
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10+Amplifier
/
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
245 / 55 R19
/
245 / 55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
233 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
233
310
390
367
/
1,152
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS95 ROYAL
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about overall equipment; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.