CS95 ROYAL vs ET BEV Comparison

Car Information

/

410km

/

77kwh

/

19.8 kWh/100km

Dimensions

7

5

4949

4980

1930

1975

1790

1694

2810

3000

/

21"

Fuel Economy

10.5

19.8 kWh/100km

74

/

Comfort

/

NFC

/

/

/

4-direction electric

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front & Back Row Seats

12.3"

/

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

front seats

Infotainment

/

10+Amplifier

23

/

15.6

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

10 min/ 20-80%

Transmission

8-Speed Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

✓ + CDC

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

245 / 55 R19

/

245 / 55 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

TBD

233 - 233

473HP

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 T

/

Gasoline

Electric

233

473HP

390

660Nm

/

353kw

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Sport, Snow, Eco

/

/

/

/

/

L2 ADAS

/

Front & Rear

/

/

/

Motor

/

2

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CS95 ROYAL

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • ET BEV

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Driving Recorder
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCS95 ROYAL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about price; choose ET BEV if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, ET BEV is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET BEV, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive.