CS95 ROYAL vs Okavango GK 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
4949
4860 mm
1930
1910 mm
1790
1770 mm
2810
2825 mm
/
5 Doors
/
257 L
/
194 mm
Fuel Economy
10.5
10 Km/L
74
52 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
10+Amplifier
6
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
245 / 55 R19
/
245 / 55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
233 BHP
190 BHP - 218
Automatic
7DCT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233
218 BHP
390
325 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS95 ROYAL
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Okavango GK 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about fuel economy; choose Okavango GK 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while Okavango GK 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, CS95 ROYAL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while Okavango GK 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Okavango GK 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Okavango GK 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.