CarteaCompare CarsCS95 ROYAL vs T2 i-DM

CS95 ROYAL vs T2 i-DM Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

200

/

4

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5

4949

4785

1930

2006

1790

1875

2810

2800

/

5

/

752

/

220

Fuel Economy

10.5

18.5

74

70 L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3"

/

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

10+Amplifier

12

/

15.6

/

/

/

Android LCD

Transmission

8-Speed Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

245 / 55 R19

/

245 / 55 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5

233 - 233

154 BHP - 600

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

3DHT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 T

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

233

154 BHP

390

220

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Sport, Snow, Eco

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CS95 ROYAL

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • T2 i-DM

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and modern exterior design
  • High fuel efficiency
  • Efficient hybrid propulsion system

Negative

  • Luggage compartment space is limited
  • Lack of digital entertainment options
  • Traction ability is not the best in its class

Related comparisons

Editor's PickT2 i-DM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CS95 ROYAL if you care more about interior space; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Changan | CS95 ROYAL

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CS95 ROYAL has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CS95 ROYAL has a wheelbase of 2810, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 ROYAL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS95 ROYAL uses Four-Wheel Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.