CT5 V 2025 vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
6
4
2998 cc
2998 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4922
4949 mm
2039
1880 mm
1452
1480 mm
2946
2961 mm
336 L
540 L
102
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
9 Km/L
64 L
66 L
8 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
✓
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
15
✓
Transmission
10-speed automatic transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 6.2 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
360 BHP - 668 BHP
204 BHP - 402
10-speed automatic transmission
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
In-Line
3.0
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
V6 engine
/
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
360 BHP
285 BHP
550 Nm
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CT5 V 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CT5 V 2025 if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CT5 V 2025 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, E300 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CT5 V 2025 has a wheelbase of 2946, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CT5 V 2025 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.