Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Bentayga 4.0L V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
290 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5341 mm
5140 mm
2164 mm
1998 mm
1835 mm
1742 mm
3295 mm
2995 mm
600 L
484 L
Fuel Economy
6.7 Km/L
8.8 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
8.8 Km/L
/
85 L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.7 L
4.0 L - 6.0 L
563 BHP
542 BHP - 626 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
6.7 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
563 BHP
542 BHP
850 Nm
770 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Rear Camera
Bentayga 4.0L V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBentayga 4.0L V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Bentayga 4.0L V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a fuel consumption of 11.36. Therefore, Bentayga 4.0L V8 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 uses All Wheel Drive.