Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs XM 2025 V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
/
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5341 mm
5110
2164 mm
2210
1835 mm
1755
3295 mm
3105
600 L
/
Fuel Economy
6.7 Km/L
/
6.7 Km/L
/
/
69
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
6.7 L
4.4 L - 4.4 L
563 BHP
653 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.7 L
4.4
Gasoline
Hybrid
563 BHP
653 BHP
850 Nm
800
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Rear Camera
XM 2025 V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Cool box
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Front Crumple Zone
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXM 2025 V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose XM 2025 V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while XM 2025 V8 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while XM 2025 V8 has a wheelbase of 3105. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while XM 2025 V8 uses No data.