CarteaCompare CarsCullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship

Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

/

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

5341 mm

4722

2164 mm

1860

1835 mm

1705

3295 mm

2710

600 L

/

Fuel Economy

6.7 Km/L

14.9

6.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

6.7 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

563 BHP

197 HP - 310 BHP

Automatic

7 DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

6.7 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

563 BHP

254 BHP

850 Nm

390

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

    • Rear Camera
  • Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Tank | 500 Elite Urban

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2023 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2020 6.0L W12 Mulliner

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2019 6.0L W12 Mulliner

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship uses All Wheel Drive.