Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

5341 mm

4700

2164 mm

1865

1835 mm

1710

3295 mm

2710

600 L

/

Fuel Economy

6.7 Km/L

/

6.7 Km/L

/

/

58

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

12

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

8

/

SONY

Transmission

/

8

/

8-Speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

225/55 R19

/

225/55 R19

Key Spec

6.7 L

2.0 L

563 BHP

229 BHP - 233 BHP

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

6.7 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

563 BHP

233 BHP

850 Nm

390

/

2.0T GDI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

    • Rear Camera
  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCS75 PLUS SPORT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Tank | 500 Elite Urban

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2023 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2020 6.0L W12 Mulliner

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2019 6.0L W12 Mulliner

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.