Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) Comparison

Car Information

/

5.4

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

250

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

5 Doors

/

5341 mm

5200

2164 mm

2073

1835 mm

1868

3295 mm

3120

600 L

639

Fuel Economy

6.7 Km/L

7.8

6.7 Km/L

/

/

104

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Key Spec

6.7 L

3.0 L - 5.0 L

563 BHP

360 BHP - 525 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

6.7 L

5.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

563 BHP

525 BHP

850 Nm

625

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

    • Rear Camera
  • Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Cool box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Rollover stability control
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2023 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2022 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2021 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Rolls Royce | Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) has a fuel consumption of 12.82. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) has a wheelbase of 3120. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS) uses All Wheel Drive.