Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Tiggo 9 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
5341 mm
4820
2164 mm
1930
1835 mm
1699
3295 mm
2820
600 L
/
/
16英寸
Fuel Economy
6.7 Km/L
/
6.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
Key Spec
6.7 L
-
563 BHP
254 - 254
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.7 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
563 BHP
254
850 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
192
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Rear Camera
Tiggo 9
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Tiggo 9 has a fuel consumption of 8.5. Therefore, Tiggo 9 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while Tiggo 9 has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 uses Four-Wheel Drive.