Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
305 km/h
/
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5341 mm
5123 mm
2164 mm
2022 mm
1835 mm
1638 mm
3295 mm
3003 mm
600 L
617 L
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
6.7 Km/L
7 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
7 Km/L
/
75 L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.7 L
4.0 L
563 BHP
650 BHP - 800 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.7 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
563 BHP
666 BHP
850 Nm
850 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Rear Camera
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Editor's PickUrus S 4.0T V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Urus S 4.0T V8 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.