CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4550 mm
1765
1840 mm
1535
1670 mm
2570
2700 mm
/
965 L
Fuel Economy
15.3
14.7 Km/L
48 LITRES
58 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
1.9 L - 2.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
151 BHP - 190 BHP
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
188 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
251 Nm
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX5 2.5L GL (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 2.5L GL (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.