CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs H7 Top 2026 Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

5

215 / 60 / R16

/

4275

4705

1765

1908

1535

1780

2570

/

Fuel Economy

15.3

/

48 LITRES

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Front and Rear

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

6

10

/

14.6

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

9-Speed Dual-Clutch Transmission

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

/

235/60 R19

/

235/60 R19

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

234

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

9-Speed Dual-Clutch Transmission

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

148 HP

234

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

/

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

(AUTO, STANDARD, SPORT, ECO, SNOW, MUD, SAND , GRASS/GRAVEL, UNEVEN

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • H7 Top 2026

    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose H7 Top 2026 if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while H7 Top 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while H7 Top 2026 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while H7 Top 2026 uses No data.