CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
215 / 60 / R16
19"
4275
4660
1765
1875
1535
1670
2570
2720
/
1578
/
176
Fuel Economy
15.3
13.3
48 LITRES
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
√
✓
/
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
8
/
✓
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
145 BHP - 148 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
195 HP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
290
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Omoda C7 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.