CX-30 Elite vs CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18"
/
4395
5075 mm
1795
1969 mm
1540
1716 mm
2655
2930 mm
/
407 L
Fuel Economy
16.1
11.8 Km/L
48
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dynamic Stability Control & Traction
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
2.5 L - 2500 L
155 BHP - 189 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Exhaust - Chrome
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
153 HP
230 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
420 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-30 Elite
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-30 Elite if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 Elite has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, CX-30 Elite is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-30 Elite has a wheelbase of 2655, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 Elite uses No data, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.