CarteaCompare CarsCX-30 TREND vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

CX-30 TREND vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

160 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18"

/

4395

4490 mm

1795

1874 mm

1540

1613 mm

2655

2750 mm

Fuel Economy

16.1

/

48

/

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Dynamic Stability Control & Traction

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

153 HP - 155 BHP

153 BHP - 305 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Exhaust - Chrome

/

/

Engine

2.0L

/

Gasoline

Electric

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

153 HP

153 BHP

153 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

200

340 Nm

200 NM @ 4000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-30 TREND

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-30 TREND if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 TREND has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-30 TREND has a wheelbase of 2655, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 TREND uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.