CX-30 TREND vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

18"

/

4395

4950 mm

1795

1930 mm

1540

1730 mm

2655

2850 mm

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

16.1

20 Km/L

48

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Rear View Camera

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Dynamic Stability Control & Traction

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

153 HP - 155 BHP

240 BHP - 240 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Exhaust - Chrome

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

153 HP

240 BHP

153 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

200

237 Nm

200 NM @ 4000 RPM

/

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-30 TREND

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-30 TREND

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-30 TREND if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 TREND has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-30 TREND has a wheelbase of 2655, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 TREND uses No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.