CarteaCompare CarsCX-30 URBANE vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

CX-30 URBANE vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

18"

/

4395

4771 mm

1795

1870 mm

1540

1828 mm

2655

2790 mm

Fuel Economy

16.1

10 Km/L

48

/

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Dynamic Stability Control & Traction

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

153 HP - 155 BHP

215 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Exhaust - Chrome

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

153 HP

215 BHP

153 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

200

280 Nm

200 NM @ 4000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-30 URBANE

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-30 URBANE if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 URBANE has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, CX-30 URBANE is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-30 URBANE has a wheelbase of 2655, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 URBANE uses No data, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.