CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
225 / 65 / R17
/
4575
4275 mm
1845
1765 mm
1675
1535 mm
2700
2570 mm
/
240 L
Fuel Economy
14.4
15.4 Km/L
58
48 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Remote Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
188 HP
148 BHP
188 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
252
192 Nm
252 Nm @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.94, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD has a wheelbase of 2700, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD uses No data, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.