CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD vs CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
225 / 65 / R17
/
4575
5075 mm
1845
1969 mm
1675
1716 mm
2700
2930 mm
/
407 L
Fuel Economy
14.4
11.8 Km/L
58
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Remote Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
188 HP
230 BHP
188 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
252
420 Nm
252 Nm @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX-5 2.5L GL 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD if you care more about price; choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.94, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD has a wheelbase of 2700, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-5 2.5L GL 2WD uses No data, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.