CarteaCompare CarsCX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

225 / 55 / R19

/

4575

4771 mm

1845

1870 mm

1675

1828 mm

2700

2790 mm

Fuel Economy

14.4

10 Km/L

58

/

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

Remote Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Pedestrian Brake

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

2.0 L

151 BHP - 188 BHP

215 BHP

6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

188 HP

215 BHP

188 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

252

280 Nm

252 Nm @ 4000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS has a fuel consumption of 6.94, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS has a wheelbase of 2700, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-5 2.5L TREND PLUS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.